Country: U.S.A.
Genre(s): Crime /
Drama
Director: Alfred
Hitchcock
Cast: Tippi Hedren
/ Sean Connery / Diane Baker
Plot
Con artist and thief
Marnie plots to rob her wealthy boss, only to have him blackmail her into
marriage once he finds out.
What I Liked
Though the title
character’s neurosis is the true focus of the movie, I found the more
intriguing character to be that of Mark Rutland, the man so obsessed with her
that he forces her into marriage. Sean
Connery plays Mark with the same suave masculinity he brought to James Bond for
the first time just two years prior.
This time, though, that confidence is mixed with a myopic fixation
bordering on dangerous and a manipulative streak that approaches villainy. Neither were traits of Bond, allowing Connery
to show his range by pulling off this added complexity with absolute
believability. He may not be the
criminal in the story, but Rutland is certainly a jerk (arguably even a
rapist), yet it’s hard to argue with the results. He may be an absolute asshole, but he gets
exactly what he wants every time he tries for it. That impressive quality alone makes him much
more interesting than Tippi Hedren’s perpetually pouty Marnie.
Director Alfred
Hitchcock makes the most of the film’s more suspenseful scenes with the various
slights of hand and gimmicks for which he was famous. However, it is really the film’s score,
composed by Bernard Herrmann (also responsible for contributing essential
scores to Hitch classics like “Vertigo,” “North by Northwest” and “Psycho”)
that contributes the truly unsettling mood to the film. Anytime Herrmann’s music can be heard, an
unavoidable eeriness permeates the movie, not necessarily in visuals or plot at all, but simply through the music’s toying with the audience’s nerves.
What I Didn’t Like
What must have been
considered a cutting-age psychological thriller wields less of an impact five
decades later, now that the films that it influenced have surpassed it both for
both psychological depth and shock value.
Marnie’s unusual hang-ups (screaming during thunderstorms, having panic
attacks at the sight of the color red, and a physical repulsion to the touch of
a man) come off more as kooky than disturbing to a modern viewer. That the plot mainly follows her husband’s
pursuit of the source of these troubles consequently weakens the film as a
whole, especially since the big payoff at the end isn’t half as shocking as the
conclusion to a run-of-the-mill “Law and Order: Criminal Intent.”
Most Memorable Scene
The most
controversial scene of the film is the consummation of the marriage between
Marnie and Mark, a scene that implies that Mark essentially rapes Marnie. Partly because the rape itself is not seen
(thankfully), it is not nearly as shocking or upsetting for a modern viewer as
it would have been for a filmgoer in 1964.
Thus I will bypass that scene and pick another as my personal favorite:
the car ride where Mark reveals his marriage plans to a dumbfounded
Marnie. He calmly breaks the news to her
with all the tact of a caveman hitting a woman over the head with a club and
making off with her slumped over his shoulder.
Meanwhile, she resorts to all the guile she can muster to manipulate her
way out of matrimony. It’s an amusing clash
of personalities that reveals a great deal of how each character makes his or
her way through the world, only in this case Mark completely dominates the
battle, with Marnie finding her bag of tricks powerless against his detached
self-confidence. Ultimately, it is still
a rape of a less physical kind, one that relies less on shock value and more on
clever writing.
My Rating: 3 out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment