Wednesday, August 27, 2014

TRISTANA (1970)

Country: Spain / Italy / France
Genre(s): Drama
Director: Luis Bunuel
Cast: Catherine Deneuve / Fernando Rey / Lola Gaos


Plot
Following her mother’s death, Tristana is sent to live with the aging Don Lope, who falls in love with her.  Feeling trapped by Lope’s overprotection, Tristana sneaks out to meet another man.  As time passes, the realities of life force Tristana and Lope to confront the consequences of obeying their passions.


What I Liked
Tristana is the most stylistically conventional of the Luis Bunuel films that I’ve seen thus far and yet the most thematically inscrutable.  Almost a half century after producing his groundbreaking surrealist films, the director produced this more formalist production, making use of more conventional plot elements and story structure.  Still, even if the film is more easily understood on the surface, symbolism, psychology, and philosophy are seething beneath that surface.  By the end of the movie, any viewer with any kind of sensitivity toward good art will find that ruminating on the nature of human relationships, emotion, gender, and even the meaning of life itself is impossible to avoid.  Bunuel does this all while shunning the more obvious imagery of his earlier work in favor of the power of suggestion.  And the power of suggestion is at the heart of his surrealist roots.

Bunuel is obsessed with the intricacies of daily life in this movie, much of which revolves around the actions of Lola Gaos in the role of Saturna, Lope’s housekeeper and Tristana’s confidant.  Saturna’s turning down of the covers on Lope’s bed or her preparing a cup of tea, all things that would be ignored by other filmmakers, are given ample screen time.  At first these moments don’t stand out, but taken as a whole, it is clear Bunuel was intentionally bringing a special significance to Saturna’s role as a kind of pacifist in the ever-changing battle of emotions between Lope and Tristana.

The three lead actors, Catherine Deneuve (as Tristana), Fernando Rey (as Lope), and Gaos are all well cast in their roles, which they all perform well.  They are convincing as an ensemble, never trying to outdo one another and instead contributing to the film as a whole.  Perhaps this too is something for which Bunuel, as their director, also deserves credit.


What I Didn’t Like
“Tristana” is a slow burn to say the least.  There are only a few moments of outright confrontation or suspense in the movie, and these moments are relatively tame when compared with similar moments in other films.  It is obvious Bunuel wanted his film to reflect a more subtle drama reflected in the changing relationships and emotions of his main characters.  By the time the film ends, it is evident that this approach is clearly part of the film’s power.  However, one must have the abundant attention span required to make it to the end, in order to experience that reward.

Incidentally, Deneuve’s French is overdubbed throughout the film by a Spanish actress.  The process itself is technically well-done in that its hardly noticeable unless one looks closely.  Still, it is silly to cast a French woman as the lead in a Spanish film just to record over her lines.


Most Memorable Scene
*spoiler alert*
In one of the film’s later scenes, Tristana, having lost her leg to disease, tells a priest that she has needs that are no longer met.  A short time later, she walks out onto a balcony and exposes herself to Saturna’s son.  The camera focuses on Deneuve’s face, the most striking close up of the entire film.  We see nothing of her body; we only watch a very carnal smirk turn from tempting to disturbing as it spreads across her face.  Even the boy, who had asked Tristana to do this, retreats into the trees, apparently confused and horrified.  It is easily Deneuve’s best moment in the picture and also possibly a tip of the hat by Bunuel to the more nightmarish imagery of his earlier films.



Rating: 4 out of 5

Thursday, August 7, 2014

GHOSTBUSTERS (1984)

Country: U.S.A.
Genre(s): Comedy
Director: Ivan Reitman
Cast: Bill Murray/ Dan Aykroyd / Sigourney Weaver


Plot
After investigating a ghost sighting, three out-of-work scientists go into business as Ghostbusters.  Initially dismissed by the public as quacks, they soon become heroes when an ancient deity attacks their native New York City.


What I Liked
As was the case for so many people of my generation, this movie was one of the cinematic cornerstones (along with, for me anyway, “Superman,” “Batman,” “UHF,” and the Indiana Jones films) of my childhood.  I spent countless afternoons watching this movie, watching its cartoon spin off, running around in my best friend's backyard dressed as a Ghostbuster, or playing in my room with my Ghostbuster action figures.  So maybe nostalgia has got me somewhat biased here, but I can't imagine few people of any generation could dispute that this movie is still thoroughly enjoyable thirty years after its initial release in theaters.

Bill Murray was my favorite part about this movie as a kid and today he still is.  Screenwriters and co-stars Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis left plenty of room in the script for Bill to adlib, which turned out to be a genius decision.  The guy is the undisputed world champion of deadpan and his Dr. Peter Venkman easily steals the show from the others.  Back in the 1980s I admired his cocky attitude and funny lines; today it is his straight-faced delivery that kills me.

Bill’s poker-faced approach is made even more funny by the outrageous antics happening all around him.  Like no other film that I know of, “Ghostbusters” successfully blends goofball comedy with blockbuster special effects.  Explosions, ray guns, earthquakes, demons, a wonderfully dated soundtrack, and one towering Stay Puft Marshmallow Man (definitely the best movie set piece of the decade, right?); it’s all done with such bombastic drama and cheeky gusto that laughing is simply unavoidable.  To put it simply, “Ghostbusters” is still more fun than almost any other movie you will ever see.


What I Didn’t Like
If there is anything at all that you don’t like about this movie, you have no soul.


Most Memorable Scene
Oh wow, I’ve given myself a tough dilemma here.  Of all the movie’s I’ve reviewed thus far, this is probably the toughest to pick just one scene, but I’m going to force myself.

Obviously the rooftop/Stay Puft climax pulled out all the stops on the “Wow” factor, but really the scene that always pops up in my head first whenever “Ghostbusters” is mentioned, is the one where Peter, Ray, and Egon all visit the library in the beginning.  It’s a hilarious introduction to the characters in a suspenseful setting and ends with the most frightening ghost in the whole movie.  An unforgettable gag and also a terrific primer for the type of hijinks that are about to ensue.



My Rating: 5 out of 5

Friday, August 1, 2014

BROKEN BLOSSOMS (1919)

Country: U.S.A.
Genre(s): Drama / Romance
Director: D.W. Griffith
Cast: Lillian Gish / Richard Barthelmess / Donald Crisp

Plot
In London, Chinese immigrant Cheng meets and falls for Lucy Burrows, an impoverished white girl who has suffered repeated abuse at the hands of her prizefighting father.  When Lucy escapes, she finds refuge in the room above Cheng’s shop.


What I Liked 
Well, in the spirit of my past reviews, I suppose I’ll have to type something here, despite my reserves about doing so.  The movie had some boxing in it.  So there’s that.  I also have to admit Richard Barthelmess delivered a thoughtful, subtle acting performance as Cheng, even if the fact that casting white men to play stereotyped Chinese men was abysmally racist.  I also suppose I should note that, for a 1919 film, it was commendably brave of director D.W. Griffith to make a Chinese character the male romantic lead in an era so xenophobic, especially as Griffith had previously directed one of the most notoriously racist films of all time, “Birth of a Nation.”


What I Didn’t Like 
Let me put it this way.  If you look at my last entry, it's been months since it was posted.  That's because it really took me that long to convince myself to finish watching this 90 minute bore.

Much has been made of the fact that this was the most reserved and downbeat film from Griffith, the first great epic film director.  The problem is, by stripping the film of the historic setting of “Birth of a Nation” and the grand sets of “Intolerance,” Griffith essentially robbed the film of any aesthetic value that would make it appeal for someone watching the movie a century into the future.  The rest is all histrionic melodrama from lead actress Lillian Gish, appalling stereotypes of Chinese people, and goofy faces from the villain, all piled up on a plot that’s far too bare-bones to be interesting today.

All that remains is its historic value as a touchstone in the development of the Hollywood filmmaking style (and also its place as the first film produced by United Artists).  The language of motion picture storytelling was still in its infancy in 1919 and this film helped push the art forward a few steps, but that fact doesn’t make it any more bearable to watch today.


Most Memorable Scene
The most famous scene is that of Lillian Gish’s spastic writhing and cringing as she hides from her abusive father in a closet.  Apparently her performance was so convincing in that time that it frightened even Griffith himself.  The truth is that this scene is far too melodramatic to hold up today.  For me, the best moment was of course the boxing match, which plays out shortly before the aforementioned confrontation.  The fighting is laughably amateurish but if you’ve ever seen motion picture footage of prizefights from the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century you’ll find the boxing match in “Broken Blossoms” actually looks fairly authentic, even if it is choreographed.  More importantly, it represents the only sustained action in a film that otherwise feels interminable.



My Rating: 1.5 out of 5