A.K.A.: Korkarlen
Country: Sweden
Genre(s): Drama /
Fantasy
Director: Victor
Sjostrom
Cast: Victor
Sjostrom / Astrid Holm / Hilda Borgstrom
Plot
Drunken vagrant David
Holm is visited by the Grim Reaper on New Year’s Eve and made to repent for his
wasted life.
What I Liked
I really want to like
“The Phantom Carriage,” because there’s a great deal to admire in this dark
fantasy film. Most obvious is the effect
described in the film’s title. Through
the use of double-exposure, director/star Victor Sjostrom pioneered the now
standard look of spirits and ghosts in motion pictures. The Grim Reaper, his horse, his carriage, and
his passenger are all partially transparent images who pass unseen down city
streets and through building walls in search of souls. Though the technique has been copied and
imitated countless times since and though it has now been replaced by the use
of CGI, somehow the ghostly images in “The Phantom Carriage” remain chilling, even
enhanced by silence and graininess of the faded black and white images of
silent film, which can be unsettling for the modern viewer.
Also interesting is
the low-key, realistic performances by the actors, at least in comparison with
the flamboyant theatrics coming out of early Hollywood at about the same time. European silent cinema seems to focus more on
the subtleties of human body movement and facial expressions than its American
counterpart, for the acting here is not all that different from the famously understated
performances found in the films of Sjostrom’s Danish contemporary, Carl Theodor
Dreyer (“Vampyr,” “The Passion of Joan of Arc”). I imagine –though I don’t know – that Dreyer
would have admired “The Phantom Carriage” very much. Unfortunately, that same restraint I admire
also got in the way of my truly enjoying the movie.
What I Didn’t Like
It took me a very
long time to get through this movie.
Weeks. It’s not that it’s very
long, clocking in at just over an hour and a half in length. It’s just that it felt so unbearably long. When
the Grim Reaper is not present, most of the film is spent on a lengthy
backstory telling of David Holm’s descent into loneliness, sin, and poverty and
of the idealistic young woman who tries to redeem him. The problem is that the story is far too long
and uninteresting, particularly when it is presented as a series of silent
conversations interrupted by constant title cards. With the exception of a few nail-biting
moments toward the end, the film is made up almost entirely of these conversations. They probably played much better to a 1921
crowd but this desensitized twenty-first century viewer was frustrated and
disappointed.
Most Memorable Scene
The first appearance
of the phantom carriage and its driver is easily the image that will most often
pop up in the memory whenever the film is mentioned and for good reason. The effect is what really makes the film
unique. Incidentally, there is also a
scene where an enraged Holm, uses an axe to chop his way through a locked
wooden door to get at his terrified wife.
I was waiting for the “Heeeeere’s Johnny!” title card but was again disappointed.
My Rating: 2 out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment